Metlivi Blog

Why Two 80 GSM Papers Can Feel and Write Differently

If two sheets are both labeled 80 gsm, they have the same stated mass per unit area, not necessarily the same thickness, opacity, surface, or ink response. To compare them, look for caliper, bulk, opacity, and surface or sizing information, then treat those figures as clues rather than a guarantee of how a particular pen will write. This guide focuses on reading those specifications and their limits.

September 29, 20265 min readEveryday Aesthetics & Self-ExpressionBy Metlivi Editorial Team
Section 1

What does 80 gsm actually measure?

GSM means grams per square metre: the mass of a given area of paper. Grammage describes how much material is present by area; it does not say how tightly the fibres and other ingredients are packed, how thick the sheet is, or what its surface is like. The [University of Manchester’s research summary on grammage and thickness](https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/grammage-dependence-of-paper-thickness/) describes a nonlinear relationship between grammage and thickness in handsheets, shaped by sheet structure.

That distinction explains why matching the number “80” does not make two papers interchangeable. Papermaking choices affect fibre composition, formation, pressing, fillers, coatings, and sizing. Those choices can change the sheet’s structure and surface while its mass per area remains similar.

Section 2

How are caliper and bulk different?

**Caliper** is sheet thickness, usually reported in micrometres (µm) or mils. **Bulk** relates thickness to grammage, often expressed as cubic centimetres per gram (cm³/g). A sheet with greater caliper at the same grammage has greater bulk. Bulk is a useful comparison because it accounts for mass, but it does not fully describe stiffness, softness, smoothness, or pen feel.

The Manchester study combined sheet measurements with X-ray microtomography and connected surface structure and porosity to thickness. It does not test every commercial notebook. For a product comparison, record caliper in the same unit and check the measurement basis. Bulk helps relate thickness to grammage, but does not replace the other specifications.

Section 3

Why can opacity vary at the same grammage?

Opacity concerns how well a sheet hides what is behind it. It is assessed through reflectance measurements, rather than being a synonym for thickness. Fibre structure and constituents affect light scattering and absorption, so equal mass per area does not establish equal opacity.

R. Farnood’s [review of paper optical properties](https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/resources/optical-properties-of-paper-theory-and-practice/) explains that opacity measurements must be interpreted with their test method. Compare values reported on a compatible basis; do not assume a thicker-looking sheet necessarily masks reverse-side content better.

Section 4

What can specifications say about writing behavior?

Paper’s surface and its interaction with liquid can affect how ink spreads, penetrates, dries, or feathers. Sizing is one manufacturing factor that influences wetting and absorption. A [BioResources study of papermaking conditions and ink absorption](https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/resources/effect-of-papermaking-conditions-on-the-ink-absorption-and-overprint-accuracy-of-paper/) examined printing ink absorption and found effects from pulp type, basis weight, sizing agent, and beating degree.

That study concerns printing experiments. Its results do **not** establish how handwriting will behave with a ballpoint, fountain pen, gel pen, or marker. Printing and handwriting use different inks, delivery methods, contact pressures, and exposure times. Use the research to understand why manufacturing variables matter, not to predict how a particular pen will behave on a notebook page.

Section 5

How can you make a useful small comparison?

Imagine two specification sheets for samples A and B, both labeled 80 gsm. Both list caliper and opacity, but only A describes its surface finish. This is an illustrative comparison, not measured product data.

If A lists greater caliper on the same test basis, it is thicker according to those specifications. Comparable opacity figures answer a separate question about masking content behind the sheet. Missing surface information for B remains unknown; neither the 80 gsm label nor the caliper fills that gap.

**Practical editorial suggestion:** when choosing paper for handwriting, obtain samples and try the pens you actually use on both sides under similar conditions. Note drying, line spread, scratchiness, and show-through separately. This is a personal selection method, not a maker’s specification or a controlled laboratory test. Maker instructions apply to the product’s stated uses and test methods; consult them when a specification is unclear.

Copy each value together with its unit, test method and product name.
Separate a missing specification from a poor result: unknown does not mean unsuitable.
Use a small handwriting sample to answer the practical question the specification leaves open.
Section 6

Which specifications should you check first?

Start with grammage to confirm the stated mass per area. Then compare caliper and, where available, bulk for thickness; compare opacity for light blocking; and look for surface, coating, or sizing descriptions relevant to liquid interaction. Record units and methods, since figures measured or reported differently may not be directly comparable. Finally, test a sample with your own writing tools: no single specification promises a particular handwriting result.

Related reading

Keep exploring this topic